Astro-Theology 1: How good is your English really?

Yesterday we looked at the difference between science the religion and the scientific method; which

requires one to demonstrate for one's self the veracity of any postulation another might provide.

Today, we will look at the importance of understanding the true meaning of whatever communications are received. Language is a powerful tool (which human beings alone possess and which overnight around 50,000 years ago was in existence without any pre-cursor and without any other species ever showing the remotest sign of developing).

The reason you do not clearly understand the message you are being told, because you are told exactly what is happening in very clear terms, is that you simply do not speak the language - you are stupid, probably because you were only educated to the level which the State wants you to be... and you are too lazy to make any effort to improve your education.

Though they are speaking English, they may as well be speaking Latin for all you understand. To truly understand you need to know all the possible meanings of every word and the meaning of the words they are derived from.

Religion

The word "Religion", in Middle Ages English, meant to live under monastic orders, the word derives from religio and before that the Latin, Religare which means "to bind". (See the Catholic dictionary).

In these terms an individual taking monastic orders is binding themselves to a particular way of life; monasticism itself originates in Egyptian (Coptic) Christianity and was founded initially by individuals who chose to be hermetic and the people, who for some reason, followed them into their seclusion.

The importance of language, can nowhere be better understood than by examining the differences between Chinese Catholics and Chinese Protestants. The translation upon which these two forms of Christianity is an entirely different book where entirely different terms are used even for such common terms as "God", "Heaven", as a result there is a wide division between these two religions whilst the actual differences in Europe are minimal and largely societal.

Jesus, of Nazareth?

Was there a place called Nazareth in the 1st Century AD? Whilst there is today, there was not then. There was a sect called the Nazarites; which is the origin of not cutting one's hair to retain your power. Thus Samson in the Hebrew Bible and even today the practices of Sikhism and Rastafarianism are reflective of this practice.

Any linguistic scholar, however, will tell you though "n" and "m" are fairly interchangeable at the start of words over time in all languages; so more likely it is Jesus the Mazzaroth. (Mazzaroth being the Hebrew word for the zodiac).

Jesus the Sun (German: Sonne (i.e. Son)) of God, dies and rises again... (yep each and every morning).

English remains one of the few languages which has two separate terms for Sky and Heaven - Sky being a Norse word and Heaven being Anglo-Saxon, two words, which originally had the exact same meaning. The fact that English has differentiated a meaning allows for greater confusion in the masses.

Astrology underlies our culture

Astrology lies at the heart of all religions and in much of what you have encountered, you probably have not looked for it and so you cannot see it; whether it be Jesus the Mazzaroth and his 12
Disciples or King Arthur and the 12 Knights of the Round Table, or even the all seeing eye above the 12 steps of the pyramid on the dollar bill the symbology is closely woven into the very fabric of our culture and society and has been for millennia.

Christianity itself has somewhat of a paradox in that whilst claiming that Astrology has no actual basis, proclaims that 3 Magi used astrology to be able to predict the birth of the Messiah. Those two statements are mutually exclusive. Further the Hebrew Bible and the Greek Testaments both state that there will be signs in the heavens.

One must wonder why it is that the most powerful telescope in the world is owned by, and its operations funded by, Vatican City.

My own interpretation would be that an organisation which singularly extols that an individual requires the intervention of one of its own scientists (or priests) must therefore not extol that anyone can work out the will of God simply by studying the movement of the planets.

This is after all an organisation which for centuries operated in a language that was only spoken by a minority - after all if you are trying to look after a society then not letting the idiots have a say makes the task that much easier... and if they don't understand what you are talking about then all the better still.

So much effort in the modern world is to confuse and obfuscate the underlying intentions of changes which are implemented not only from the masses, but even from the people who are notionally making the change (politicians and lawyers).