Posts

PRESS RELEASE: FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST HOME AFFAIRS MINISTER OVER LACK OF PRISON OVERSIGHT

Image
A formal complaint has been lodged against the Minister for Home Affairs alleging a failure to ensure independent and procedurally fair oversight of complaints concerning the States of Jersey Prison Service. The complaint, submitted under the Ministerial Code, argues that complaints concerning prison conduct and decision-making are routinely redirected back to the Prison Service itself, rather than being considered by an independent and impartial body. The complaint further argues that this creates a structural conflict of interest whereby the subject of complaints is effectively permitted to investigate itself. The issue is particularly significant because the Court of Appeal previously found that the Prison Service breached my human rights after I was forced to attend my father’s funeral in handcuffs following what the Court described as a flawed and unjustifiable risk assessment process. The case was reported by Bailiwick Express: https://www.bailiwickexpress.com/news/handcuffing-pr...

Why the people of Jersey should accept political parties

Image
For a place like Jersey , the weakness of independent politics is not just fragmentation — it is vulnerability. An isolated States Member can be pressured, managed, delayed, exhausted or quietly neutralised by an entrenched civil service far more easily than a disciplined political party can. Political parties are not merely electoral machines. They are structures of accountability and collective resistance. A lone deputy who challenges the bureaucracy risks being isolated: denied influence, excluded from informal networks, overwhelmed with procedure, outmanoeuvred by institutional continuity, or gradually absorbed into the administrative culture they were elected to scrutinise. But a party changes the balance entirely. A party gives elected representatives: shared policy, shared research, collective discipline, institutional memory, and political consequences for betrayal or drift. Most importantly, parties create loyalty to voters and principles rather than dependenc...

Veils to Perception

Image
Dr Ott’s Nine Veils: A Modern Reimagining of an Ancient Idea The concept of the Nine Veils to Perception , often attributed in modern discussion to Dr Ott, can be understood as a contemporary development built upon the earlier Eight Veils of Don Harkins, while also echoing far older ideas found in Gnostic Christianity—particularly the role of the Archons. Taken together, these frameworks attempt to answer a shared question: What are the layers that separate human beings from a fuller perception of reality—and why do they exist at all? Source of the Modern Formulation The modern nine-veil structure is most clearly articulated in A. True Ott’s article: 👉 The 9 Veils Placed On Every Human Soul This text builds on Harkins’ earlier work and sets out the expanded model, including the key principles that perception is limited, progression is rare, and those who move beyond early veils are often perceived as irrational by others. From Gnostic Cosmology to Modern F...

Understanding the Nine Veils: Why Can't People See The Truth?

Understanding the Nine Veils 'Ninety percent of all humanity will live and die without having pierced the first veil.' ' D Harkins Nearly a decade ago, a dear friend and colleague of mine named Don Harkins authored a wonderfully thought-provoking piece entitled 'Slavery and the eight veils. Prior to Harkins' untimely death, we discussed this 'Eight-veils theory' for literally hours together ' and in the end, Don asked me to write a piece about this for his newspaper, 'The Idaho Observer.' He did this, because I had shared much of my research with Don, and we together came to the conclusion that in reality, there were actually NINE veils placed on the human soul (i.e. intelligence), and that spiritual progression and thus a full knowledge of TRUTH would require the piercing of these Nine Veils. ...

Gaslighted by the government

Image
Alone against the world There is a form of gaslighting that goes far beyond the personal. It is not the quiet distortion of truth within a relationship, but something far more pervasive—something structural. It occurs when institutions that are supposed to uphold truth instead reshape it, and when that reshaped version is repeated so often that it hardens into accepted reality. This kind of societal gaslighting can emerge when the police assert a version of events that does not align with lived experience or observable truth, when courts reinforce that narrative through official findings, and when the press amplifies it without sufficient scrutiny. Over time, repetition gives the illusion of legitimacy. What begins as an assertion becomes a “fact,” not because it is true, but because it has been authoritatively declared and widely echoed. For the individual who knows otherwise, this creates a profound tension. It is not simply a disagreement—it is a collision between inner certainty an...

From Indulgences to Immunity: How Jersey Learned to Escape Judgment

Image
If you lived in medieval Europe and feared judgment, there was a solution: pay for it. Not to avoid sin—that still required repentance—but to soften the consequences. Indulgences offered a way, however imperfect, to manage what came after death. The system became so entrenched that it helped provoke the Reformation. When Martin Luther pushed back, he wasn’t denying judgment—he was insisting it couldn’t be bought, outsourced, or reduced to a transaction. Judgment, in other words, was personal.  That is precisely what has changed. Jersey’s Quiet Shift: From Responsibility to Process In modern Jersey, no one sells indulgences. But something more sophisticated has taken their place. When serious administrative failures occur—whether in planning decisions, safeguarding breakdowns, or the long shadow of historic abuse cases—the public is often told that: procedures were followed systems were under pressure lessons will be learned And yet, again and again, no i...

The State and the Destruction of the Truth-Teller

Image
The execution of Jesus Christ is often framed as a tragic misunderstanding, a collision between religious disagreement and political circumstance. Yet historically, it is something far more direct: an act of state violence. Jesus was executed by the authority of Rome, under the governance of Pontius Pilate, using crucifixion—a punishment reserved not for theological error, but for those perceived as threats to order. But why does the state respond in this way to certain individuals? A common explanation is necessity—that the state must preserve stability, that it acts reluctantly but rationally to maintain order. This view, however, assumes that the state is fundamentally neutral or even benevolent. There is another, darker interpretation, one articulated by M. Scott Peck in his work People of the Lie . Peck defines evil not primarily as aggression or violence, but as a refusal to acknowledge one’s own faults. Evil, in this framework, is the active avoidance of truth about onesel...