From the Summit of the Moral High Ground

If every government power creates opportunities for abuse, one might expect governments to exercise great restraint before assuming new responsibilities. History suggests the opposite. Modern governments have grown steadily in size, scope and influence. They regulate more activities than previous generations could have imagined. They collect more information, levy more taxes, administer more services and influence more aspects of daily life. Why? The obvious answer is that governments seek power for its own sake. Sometimes that may be true. More often, however, I believe government grows for a far simpler reason. Every problem creates a demand for action. When crime rises, people demand tougher laws. When businesses fail, people demand financial assistance. When housing becomes expensive, people demand regulation. When inflation rises, people demand intervention. When people lose their jobs, they demand support. When healthcare struggles, they demand additional funding. Politicians res...

Twenty years is a long time. When I published the first articles on this blog back in 2005, I genuinely believed that politics could make the world a better place. Like many people entering public life for the first time, I believed that if enough honest people became involved, if enough good ideas were debated, and if enough poor decisions were challenged, then society could gradually be improved. Looking back, I smile at that optimism. It is one of the privileges of youth to believe that problems are simple, that institutions exist to fulfil the purposes for which they were created, and that those entrusted with public office are motivated principally by a desire to serve the public. Experience has a habit of challenging comfortable assumptions. Over the past twenty years this blog has wandered across many different subjects. There have been articles about economics, taxation, constitutional reform, libertarian philosophy, civil liberties, Jersey politics, government policy and the o...

Historical Archive This article is preserved as part of the historical record of this blog. It reflects the author's views at the time of publication. The content has not been substantively altered, although the HTML, accessibility and formatting have been updated to meet modern web standards. Amid the din of economic nonsense being bandied about since 2008, there has been the persistent refrain that the States should be run more like a business. If only more business people were in charge to wield their business acumen, we would have this country in shape in no time. But is that really a good solution? Businesses seek primarily to increase their revenues and profits. Government revenue depends upon taxation. Government accumulates tax money by collecting it from the productive earnings of Islanders through its statutory powers. At the time of writing, the Government of Jersey collected roughly £600 million annually. I argued that increasing government revenue was not t...

The welfare state, as defined in textbooks, is a form of government where the state ensures the economic and social well-being of its citizens, based on the principle of public responsibility for those unable to secure a decent standard of living independently. While this concept encompasses various economic and social arrangements, critiques suggest it fosters dependence that aligns with governmental goals of social control. This dependence increases as higher taxation funds more generous social programs, ensnaring more citizens in a cycle of benefit reliance. This dynamic creates a tacit agreement between voters and politicians: politicians promise support and voters absolve themselves of personal responsibility, preferring leaders who pledge, "Trust me, I will look after you." Critics warn this collective complacency mirrors the behaviour of a herd led unknowingly to unfavourable outcomes. Key concepts contextualising this discussion include: Social Welfare: ...