From the Summit of the Moral High Ground

Most political arguments begin by asking what government should do. I believe they begin with the wrong question. Before deciding what powers a government should possess, we must first ask a more fundamental question: What assumptions should we make about power itself? My answer is simple. Every power granted by government will create opportunities for abuse. Notice carefully what I am not saying. I am not claiming that every public servant is corrupt. I am not claiming that every government programme is harmful. Nor am I suggesting that every exercise of governmental authority results in injustice. Rather, I begin with an observation about human nature. Human beings are imperfect. Some are honest. Some are selfish. Some are compassionate. Some are malicious. Most are simply ordinary people responding to incentives, pressures and opportunities. Government does not change human nature. It merely places ordinary people in positions where they can exercise extraordinary authority over ot...

Twenty years is a long time. When I published the first articles on this blog back in 2005, I genuinely believed that politics could make the world a better place. Like many people entering public life for the first time, I believed that if enough honest people became involved, if enough good ideas were debated, and if enough poor decisions were challenged, then society could gradually be improved. Looking back, I smile at that optimism. It is one of the privileges of youth to believe that problems are simple, that institutions exist to fulfil the purposes for which they were created, and that those entrusted with public office are motivated principally by a desire to serve the public. Experience has a habit of challenging comfortable assumptions. Over the past twenty years this blog has wandered across many different subjects. There have been articles about economics, taxation, constitutional reform, libertarian philosophy, civil liberties, Jersey politics, government policy and the o...

Alone against the world There is a form of gaslighting that goes far beyond the personal. It is not the quiet distortion of truth within a relationship, but something far more pervasive—something structural. It occurs when institutions that are supposed to uphold truth instead reshape it, and when that reshaped version is repeated so often that it hardens into accepted reality. This kind of societal gaslighting can emerge when the police assert a version of events that does not align with lived experience or observable truth, when courts reinforce that narrative through official findings, and when the press amplifies it without sufficient scrutiny. Over time, repetition gives the illusion of legitimacy. What begins as an assertion becomes a “fact,” not because it is true, but because it has been authoritatively declared and widely echoed. For the individual who knows otherwise, this creates a profound tension. It is not simply a disagreement—it is a collision between inner certainty an...

Historical Archive This article is preserved as part of the historical record of this blog. It reflects the author's views at the time of publication. The content has not been substantively altered, although the HTML, accessibility and formatting have been updated to meet modern web standards. Jurats led by Jurat Le Breton, Liberation Day 2008 Extract from: Jersey Courts – Jurats Italics indicate editorial additions. Jurats are elected to serve in the Royal Court and to decide questions of fact in court cases. They sit next to the judge and not only decide the facts in both civil and criminal trials; they also award damages and fines as well as determine sentences. The work of the Jurats is unpaid (although they receive substantial "expenses" and benefits such as free parking in Vine Street) and they are appointed by the Electoral College, consisting of the Bailiff, Jurats, the Connétables of the twelve parish...